Category: Town Government

  • Rocky Hill’s Tight Budget is the Result of Years of Poor GOP Decision-making

    Rocky Hill’s Tight Budget is the Result of Years of Poor GOP Decision-making

    Once again the annual budget season is upon us. In the coming weeks the Town Council will conduct a series of public hearings and workshops to set the mil rate that establishes the taxes for the upcoming fiscal year. 

    The spectre of potential cuts in State and Federal funding hovers over the Council’s efforts to develop a budget this year. The chaos of the Trump administration results in increasing cuts of Federal funding to Connecticut. In turn, state legislators struggle to determine funds to towns amidst shifting federal priorities. Here in Rocky Hill, we must make a budget that takes all this uncertainty into account.

    The Rocky Hill Town Council is responsible for creating a budget that maintains and perhaps enhances existing services while minimizing tax increases. The task this year is especially difficult due to GOP-led Council budget decisions, which have resulted in increased taxes and stagnant services.

    The preamble to the Town Manager’s proposed budget correctly states that a considerable increase in taxes for the 2024-2025 tax period is due to homeowners revaluations. This is, however, only one part of the puzzle. Taxes rose not just because home values increased, but because the town took on significant financial burdens and failed to grow our economic sector.

    For example, Rocky Hill was fortunate enough to receive approximately 5.9 million dollars under President Biden’s American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding during the COVID-19 pandemic era. These ARPA funds were supposed to allow the Council to maintain services and add enhancements as needed.  Unfortunately, rather than using the ARPA funding primarily for needed construction or maintenance projects, some ARPA funding was imprudently used for hiring  full-time positions at town hall. The full time Emergency Manager position turned into a fiasco and waste of funds. Others hired with ARPA funds which have been exhausted must now be funded by taxpayer tax money.

    These funds could have been used to avoid a  tax burden. Many years ago the Town Council became aware that Stevens School required a new HVAC system. The HVAC project for Stevens School of approximately 1.6 million dollars could have been partially funded by the Town ARPA funds and partially funded by a State grant.  The GOP majority on the Council opted to not accept the grant, but to fund the Stevens HVAC project with local taxpayer dollars over a 3 year period. That project has now been extended even further due to other more urgent projects with the likelihood of increased costs going forward and little chance of obtaining further grants. This will ultimately cost the taxpayers even more money. 

    Other factors have impacted the tax burden on Rocky Hill’s taxpayers. Reports from the Town Assessor have shown that our business Grand List – a listing of all assessed and taxable properties in town –  has remained mostly flat. This means that the bulk of any tax increases faced by the town falls on the backs of residential taxpayers.  Hopefully the recently hired Economic Development Manager can make a positive impact, after prior budgets had “frozen” that position, leaving no town staff exclusively working to grow Rocky Hill’s Grand List. 

    As Democrats have consistently argued, the GOP majority exacerbates the tax burden for residents by overly favoring developers. Take the Republican decision to offer a  generous 10+ year abatement for the Kelson Row project.  Kelson Row is currently paying approximately $82,000 in taxes as opposed to the pre-revaluation estimated taxes of more than $1 million annually. As multi-family property values have skyrocketed since the pandemic, Kelson Row saw no increase, nor will see any increase, when it could  be contributing significantly more than $1 million per year to our tax base at full valuation. 

    This abatement is not set to expire until 2034. Again, the taxes not paid because of this abatement must be paid by residential tax payers, many of whom are on a fixed income or are struggling families trying to make ends meet.

    This year it is very important for the citizen taxpayers of Rocky Hill to make their voices heard. We the members of the Council represent you. Attend budget hearings and workshops and comment. Send in written letters or emails to be read into the public record, sign petitions, write letters to the editor. What are your priorities overall and what are your priorities should Federal or State funding be reduced? 

     A budget hearing will be held on April 22nd with workshops on April 24th, April 29th and May 1st. Also May 6th and 8th only if necessary. The Council final vote on the budget is on May 19th.  

    Make your voices heard!

  • The Draft of Rocky Hill’s new Plan of Conservation and Development is Now Live

    The Draft of Rocky Hill’s new Plan of Conservation and Development is Now Live

    The Town of Rocky Hill has released a draft Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD). This document outlines the town’s development priorities, and will be a nonbinding but influential text shaping town decision-making for the next decade.

    The 184 page document is wide-reaching, and Rocky Hill Democrats plan to provide feedback on the document in an upcoming post. I provide initial summaries below.

    Survey Responses

    Over 200 residents responded to the town survey asking for input on the POCD. A overview by the town begins on page 11:

    Environment – things to protect and preserve – through many Plan Implementation Meetings and the online survey, sustainability is very important to the residents of Rocky Hill. Also, open space preservation and enjoyment was top on most lists

    Economic Development – a majority of those surveyed agreed that there needs to be a good mix of business and residential development. They prefer High Tech, Manufacturing and Medical as businesses to come to or stay in town. Those surveyed also agree that Restaurants and Specialty Businesses should be supported in Rocky Hill

    Transportation/Infrastructure – A high percentage strongly agreed that walkability and a bike friendly community was important to them. This included a public trail system. This surveyed also agree that transportation is key to attract new residents and businesses to town.

    Development – over half surveyed believe that housing choice in town is important to them. Many saw these top points to have a mix of housing for current and future residents. A high percentage were Agreeable/Neutral on Mixed Uses on the Silas Deane.

    Community – Many who were surveyed agreed that expanding public spaces for public uses and expanding the arts was important to them. The promotion of the history of the town was also well represented with most of those surveyed agreeing to embrace the past. There was more of a neutral response to community health programs.

    Implementation – Many residents agreed that the POCD should be a living document and that it can be spoken about and changed at any time during the duration of the document

    Town Center Details

    The draft POCD expands upon a concept raised in the 2015 document: “a mixed‐use, pedestrian‐friendly Town Center in Rocky Hill with a “sense of place”. Notably, the document emphasizes that the plan will require shifts in zoning policy to realize.

    While the predominant development approach over the past 50 years has been automobile‐oriented patterns with single‐use sites, there is growing interest and demand for more walkable development patterns with a diversity of uses within individual buildings and in small areas. With the current development of the Town Center along the Silas Deane Highway and with the residential neighborhoods nearby, the area to the North of the current Town Center has good potential to support the expansion of a mixed-use development approach. However, to turn this potential into reality will require a major shift in terms of how Rocky Hill has historically approached land use and zoning. (pg 41)

    a diagram showing two sketkes of a potential town center. one of the features pictures a roundabout in the town center.
    A 2006 case study illustrating what a town center in Rocky Hill might look like (page 44)

    Non-car-based transit is a frequent topic of the POC as measured by the number of times terms  are mentioned: “Walk” (77), Bike”/”Bicycle” (42), “Pedestrian” (37), and “Bus” (9). The town references a website, newurbanism.org, as a guidance resource. The plan also references the Complete Streets policy, which was adopted by the Town Council in 2023, as an important mechanism to achieve these goals (pg 68).

    Open Space Conservation

    The POCD also places significant focus on Open Space Conservation (the term “Open Space” is refernced 95 times in the document). Methods of preserving open space discussed include:

    • Creating an “Open Space System” to increase the accessibility of the entire pen space system to the town’s residents and greatly add to its potential recreation use.” (pg 21)
    • Encourage Open Space Development Patterns: “to help ensure that important natural resources and features are protected, open spaces are preserved for public use and enjoyment, and community character is preserved.” (pg 24)
    A visual of open space residental planning, which show increasing density for houses and preservation of green space and common areas
    A visual of open space residental planning, which show increasing density for houses and preservation of green space and common areas

    Next Steps

    The published document is a draft document. It will be discussed in more detail in an upcoming planning and zoning meeting. The POCD must be approved by the Town Council by the third Monday in May.

    A reminder: the POCD is an advisory document. The authors state that to achieve what is laid out, active steps must be taken by the town. (pg 1).

    While a vision can be a powerful thing, it is important to note that a Plan of Conservation and Development is primarily an advisory document. It is intended to guide local residents, developers, businesses, suggest desirable future directions and outcomes, and provide a framework for consistent decision‐making with regard to conservation and development activities in Rocky Hill over the next decade or so. The Plan should also be a living document over its life span.

    What do you think?

    What are your reactions to the Plan of Conservation and Development? What elements within the plan are you happy about? In your opinion, what is missing? Please comment below to share your thoughts.