Tag: Budget Cuts

  • A Father’s Plea: Don’t Gamble with Our Firefighters’ Safety

    A Father’s Plea: Don’t Gamble with Our Firefighters’ Safety

    Opinion piece: this article reflects the opinion of the author.

    When the siren sounds, volunteer firefighters drop everything, work, school, family dinners , and go. They’re the ones running toward emergencies while the rest of us wait for help to arrive.

    That kind of dedication deserves respect,  and real support. So when I learned that the fire department’s training budget was cut nearly in half, and the equipment budget reduced even beyond what the Town Manager recommended, I was stunned. These weren’t small adjustments. They were unnecessary cuts that put public safety at risk. They were above the recommendations of the town manager, and what was asked for by the department, knowing that it needs to maintain a properly trained department. .

    Rocky Hill’s Fire Department has worked hard to rebuild its ranks after years of recruitment struggles. Many of the new members are young and still gaining experience. That makes training and proper equipment more important than ever. Cutting those resources doesn’t save money, it creates risk.

    This isn’t about politics. It’s about common sense. You can’t expect firefighters to protect the community without giving them the tools and training to do it safely. Every dollar taken from those budgets increases the chance that something goes wrong,  not just for the firefighters, but for the people they’re trying to save.

    Volunteer firefighters already do so much with so little. They balance jobs, families, and their commitment to serve. They don’t ask for much, just what they need to do the job right and come home safely.

    Our elected officials should be asking themselves one question: would they be comfortable knowing a loved one is heading into a fire or crash without the best possible training or gear? Because that’s what these cuts mean, a department trying to do more with less, when “less” could mean the difference between life and death.

    We owe our first responders more than thank-yous and social media posts. We owe them investment,  in training, in equipment, and in readiness. If the budget needs trimming, start somewhere else. Cut the nonessentials, not public safety.

    As a father of a teenage firefighter, this isn’t abstract to me,  it’s personal. When that siren sounds, I know my son will answer the call. And like every parent of a firefighter, I want him , and everyone he serves alongside,  to have what they need to come home safe.

    Our firefighters show up for us on our worst days, in the middle of our worst nights, without pause and without pay. The least we can do is show up for them. Proper training. Proper equipment. Proper investment. Anything less is gambling with lives, something no parent or community should ever accept.There’s no budget victory worth a firefighter’s life. Not my son’s. Not anyone’s. That’s why I’ll be voting for leadership that puts public safety first, funds our core services, and plans responsibly for Rocky Hill’s future. I’ll be voting for Allan Smith and the entire Row A slate  to bring back a responsible majority that knows what truly matters.

  • Mayor Marotta, if Rocky Hill schools are fully funded, why are we cutting programs?

    Mayor Marotta, if Rocky Hill schools are fully funded, why are we cutting programs?

    This article represents the opinion of the author and not of the Rocky Hill Board of Education. 

    Dear Mayor Marotta,

    I was a bit confused by a recent message you published regarding our schools. As you know, the Board of Education was forced to make significant reductions to its budget. If, as you’ve stated, you believe the district was fully funded, I’m trying to understand why you think such drastic measures were still necessary.

    While it is true that the Town Council increased the BOE budget on paper, the messaging overlooked the substantial cost drivers we are obligated to meet, namely, negotiated salary increases and rising insurance costs. These contractual and industry-standard expenses are essential to remaining competitive, particularly at a time when districts across the state are facing a teacher shortage. 

    Our district already ranks among the lowest in per-pupil spending statewide, and the lowest within our DRG, yet we perform in the 20s academically. That should demonstrate that the board is fiscally responsible and invests wisely in our classrooms. 

    The impact of the cuts this year is visible. We have 2nd-grade classrooms with 23 students, 4th-grade classrooms with 24 students, when research consistently shows that early elementary literacy thrives in smaller settings, ideally around 18 students. Even a small increase materially affects instructional time, particularly during foundational reading years.

    It is my understanding that the Town Manager recommended a $350,000 reduction, and the Republican members of the Town Council chose to almost double that number, cutting $650,000. I am interested in understanding the rationale behind exceeding the professional recommendation. Are we intentionally moving toward being the lowest-funded district in the state?

    I also want to acknowledge something you mentioned, that the Town Council does not make line item decisions for the BOE budget. That is absolutely correct. However, the Town Council does control the purse strings, and the funding level directly determines what programs and staffing they are able to sustain. For that reason, open, accurate, and consistent communication between the BOE, the Town Council, and the liaison role is essential. It’s unfortunate that the school liaison is not held accountable for not providing reports or attending BOE meetings. 

    I believe stronger communication could have helped avoid some of the challenges we’re now facing. These cuts had real instructional consequences. The BOE was unable to hire additional teachers to reduce class sizes. They could not fund a  World Languages program at Moser. These are not minor adjustments; they are program losses that directly affect students.

    If you believe Rocky Hill Schools were fully funded, how do you reconcile that with the need to cut programs and increase class sizes? Do you believe these outcomes are insignificant, or do you disagree that the cuts caused them?

    I believe our schools are great, and want to make sure they continue to be. Our goal should be to move the district forward, not backwards. The Central Office has done an exceptional job managing an increasingly limited budget, but it cannot overcome structural underfunding. Without appropriate support, sustaining the quality of our schools becomes an impossible task. 

    The Democrats running for Town Council and the Board of Education this election will not only prioritize funding necessary programs and maintenance for our schools, but also collaborate better with our educators. That’s not just my opinion; it is the opinion of the Rocky HIll Teachers Association, which endorsed the entire Democratic slate. Rocky Hill residents must vote for change to ensure the best environment for our students and teachers.