Tag: Moser

  • Mayor Marotta, if Rocky Hill schools are fully funded, why are we cutting programs?

    Mayor Marotta, if Rocky Hill schools are fully funded, why are we cutting programs?

    This article represents the opinion of the author and not of the Rocky Hill Board of Education. 

    Dear Mayor Marotta,

    I was a bit confused by a recent message you published regarding our schools. As you know, the Board of Education was forced to make significant reductions to its budget. If, as you’ve stated, you believe the district was fully funded, I’m trying to understand why you think such drastic measures were still necessary.

    While it is true that the Town Council increased the BOE budget on paper, the messaging overlooked the substantial cost drivers we are obligated to meet, namely, negotiated salary increases and rising insurance costs. These contractual and industry-standard expenses are essential to remaining competitive, particularly at a time when districts across the state are facing a teacher shortage. 

    Our district already ranks among the lowest in per-pupil spending statewide, and the lowest within our DRG, yet we perform in the 20s academically. That should demonstrate that the board is fiscally responsible and invests wisely in our classrooms. 

    The impact of the cuts this year is visible. We have 2nd-grade classrooms with 23 students, 4th-grade classrooms with 24 students, when research consistently shows that early elementary literacy thrives in smaller settings, ideally around 18 students. Even a small increase materially affects instructional time, particularly during foundational reading years.

    It is my understanding that the Town Manager recommended a $350,000 reduction, and the Republican members of the Town Council chose to almost double that number, cutting $650,000. I am interested in understanding the rationale behind exceeding the professional recommendation. Are we intentionally moving toward being the lowest-funded district in the state?

    I also want to acknowledge something you mentioned, that the Town Council does not make line item decisions for the BOE budget. That is absolutely correct. However, the Town Council does control the purse strings, and the funding level directly determines what programs and staffing they are able to sustain. For that reason, open, accurate, and consistent communication between the BOE, the Town Council, and the liaison role is essential. It’s unfortunate that the school liaison is not held accountable for not providing reports or attending BOE meetings. 

    I believe stronger communication could have helped avoid some of the challenges we’re now facing. These cuts had real instructional consequences. The BOE was unable to hire additional teachers to reduce class sizes. They could not fund a  World Languages program at Moser. These are not minor adjustments; they are program losses that directly affect students.

    If you believe Rocky Hill Schools were fully funded, how do you reconcile that with the need to cut programs and increase class sizes? Do you believe these outcomes are insignificant, or do you disagree that the cuts caused them?

    I believe our schools are great, and want to make sure they continue to be. Our goal should be to move the district forward, not backwards. The Central Office has done an exceptional job managing an increasingly limited budget, but it cannot overcome structural underfunding. Without appropriate support, sustaining the quality of our schools becomes an impossible task. 

    The Democrats running for Town Council and the Board of Education this election will not only prioritize funding necessary programs and maintenance for our schools, but also collaborate better with our educators. That’s not just my opinion; it is the opinion of the Rocky HIll Teachers Association, which endorsed the entire Democratic slate. Rocky Hill residents must vote for change to ensure the best environment for our students and teachers. 

  • The Case for Local Investment in Our Schools

    The Case for Local Investment in Our Schools

    As someone who taught 4th grade for four years, I know firsthand how critical funding is to the success of both students and teachers.

    In my classroom of 20 students, many required extra support, whether that meant help focusing during lessons, guidance with assignments, or simply someone to listen. I wanted to give each child the individualized attention they deserved, but with one teacher and limited resources, it was impossible to keep up with their diverse needs.

    As a teacher, you don’t just deliver lessons. You juggle dozens of roles at once. In a single 45-minute math block, I might be guiding one student through long division, helping another decode a word problem, reminding a third to stay on task, and calming a fourth who is overwhelmed and near tears. At the same time, a student might ask to use the bathroom, another may be struggling with a Chromebook that won’t log in, and two others could be having a conflict that needs immediate attention. Teaching often feels like trying to run ten parallel lessons at once. 

    “Teaching is such a rewarding job. But without enough staffing support or resources, it becomes an impossible task.”

    And all of this happens on top of the hours of preparation and follow-up that make the day possible: designing lessons that reach every learner regardless of their level, gathering materials, grading assignments, and staying in touch with parents about their child’s progress or concerns. Teaching doesn’t end when the bell rings. It continues long after the students go home. 

    Photo by Allison Shelley/The Verbatim Agency for EDUimages

    Teaching is such a rewarding job. But without enough staffing support or resources, it becomes an impossible task. Imagine a doctor’s office where one physician was responsible for seeing 20 patients simultaneously, each with different needs, some requiring constant attention. That’s what many classrooms feel like.

    Here is what class sizes look like in town this year, according to a document presented at the September 18 Board of Education meeting. A follow-up report is expected at the October 18th meeting.

    A table indicating average class sizes

    In Rocky Hill, elementary class sizes are often larger than 20 students, with some even reaching 26. While many of our classes are close to the maximum size according to our board policy, the student-to-teacher ratios are larger than many experts recommend. Across the decades, studies have shown that class sizes of 12-17 students lead to better educational outcomes than classes of 21-15 students. The state of Connecticut recommends class sizes of 18 for grades K-3.

    That gap represents several additional children per classroom, each with their own needs, without any extra adult in the room to help. Teachers want to give their best, but without more people, more tools, and more time, we’re set up to fail. This struggle is part of the reason why I eventually left the classroom.

    My district expected outstanding results and strong test scores, but it could not provide the staffing, time, or resources necessary to make those expectations realistic. Teachers often face this impossible equation: do more with less, year after year.

    The truth is, funding makes a real difference. When schools are properly funded, they can provide the support that makes quality teaching and learning possible. Essential supplies, engaging curriculum, paraprofessionals and specialists to share the workload, and the time and resources teachers need to meet each student’s need, are essential. All of these investments directly affect the quality of education children receive and the stability of the teaching profession itself. 

    “Teachers often face this impossible equation: do more with less, year after year.”

    But the benefits of school funding go beyond the classroom. Even if you don’t have a child in the public school system, you benefit directly from strong schools. They attract new families, increase home values, strengthen the local economy, and prepare the next generation of citizens to contribute to society. A well-educated community is a safer, healthier, and far more vibrant one.

    A woman teaching music
    Photo by Allison Shelley/The Verbatim Agency for EDUimage

    To quote author John Green, “Public education does not exist for the benefit of students or the benefit of their parents. It exists for the benefit of the social order. We have discovered as a species that it is useful to have an educated population. You do not need to be a student or have a child who is a student to benefit from public education. Every second of every day of your life, you benefit from public education.”

    In other words, supporting our schools isn’t charity. It’s an investment in ourselves and our town’s future. Knowledge is power, and when we withhold resources from our schools, we chip away at that power. We limit our children’s futures and, in turn, our community’s potential.

    Local funding decisions matter. Every dollar allocated to education ripples outward, shaping not just the lives of students and teachers, but the well-being and success of our entire community. This is why it’s essential to support candidates who are committed to prioritizing education. Rocky Hill deserves leaders who will fight for manageable class sizes, support staff, and the resources teachers need to do their jobs well. Our community’s future depends on the choices we make at the polls now. 

    Opinion piece: This article reflects the position of the author and not necessarily that of the Democratic Town Committee.