Tag: Rocky Hill

  • Larson Opening Statement at Social Security and Worker and Family Support

    Larson Opening Statement at Social Security and Worker and Family Support

    From the website of Congressman John Larson:

    Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

    Good to see you again, Commissioner. 

    Let’s cut to the chase. 

    Your attendance today stands in stark contrast to our attempts to get Elon Musk and ‘DOGE’ in front of us. 

    This hearing today is paramount because we have 24-year-olds at ‘DOGE’ going through people’s records at Social Security. 

    When people hear about that, they are outraged about it. 

    We have a bill to stop that. 

    We hope we will get a hearing and a vote on it. 

    When we get to questions, I will ask you if you support that. 

    It seems blatantly obvious to me that the intent here is to privatize Social Security. 

    I’ve read through your testimony, and I think that as someone who comes from a family of 15 — I believe you have a heart and compassion and understand what people need. 

    But your testimony is all about changes you want to make that may not actually meet seniors’ needs. 

    This is the first hearing on this, and we need a multitude of them because issues like data privacy and artificial intelligence are vitally important to the American people, especially when it comes to the safety and security of their hard-earned benefits and need to be addressed. 

    This is the nation’s number one insurance and anti-poverty program nothing in your testimony talks about enhancing benefits.

    While technology is important, people don’t need to talk to an algorithm. They need to be able to talk to a human being. 

    Before our very eyes, the Trump Administration, ‘DOGE,’ and Republicans are trying to rip hard-earned benefits out of the hands of Americans. 

    Regional offices are being closed, customer service is being slashed, and 7,000 employees are being cut. 

    How does this meet people “where they are” like you promised me? 

    How are we going to address Social Security and ensure the more than 70 million Americans who rely on it continue to receive their hard-earned benefits? 

    We have 10,000 baby boomers a day becoming eligible for Social Security.

    Five million of our seniors live in poverty. 

    People have died waiting for their Social Security disability benefits. 

    It has never been more urgent to act to protect America’s number 1 anti-poverty program for seniors and for children and enhance benefits after more than 50 years of inaction.

    Democrats have a plan to enhance benefits, end the disability waiting period, and eliminate the taxation of Social Security by finally making the wealthy pay their fair share. 

    Republicans are dismantling Social Security from within, so they can give the private sector access to the $2.7 trillion in the trust funds that President Trump and Elon Musk have had their eyes on. 

    And as of this week, customer service metrics, including data on wait times over the phone, were taken off the Social Security website. 

    Seniors need to talk to a human being on the phone. 

    They don’t want to try to navigate an online portal. 

    I guess this shouldn’t be too much of a surprise. 

    When he took office, President Trump directed Elon Musk’s ‘DOGE’ to find $2 trillion in cuts. 

    Hmmm, now what program has $2.7 trillion in its trust funds? 

    That’s right. Social Security. 

    Mr. Musk even said that Social Security was one of ‘DOGE’s key targets to cut – calling it the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time on Joe Rogan’s podcast. 

    Social Security is not a Ponzi scheme. It is an earned benefit that Americans pay into with each and every paycheck. 

    Elon Musk may be gone from this Administration, but ‘DOGE’ is still alive and well. 

    Mr. Bisignano, you declared that you too were a ‘DOGE’ person. 

    Even after they spread false claims that 150-year-olds were receiving benefits, which has been disproven time and time again – you said that the work they’ve done was “100% accurate.” 

    These cuts are undermining your promise to support beneficiaries and setting the stage for the Republicans’ true plan – privatization. 

    We have seen Republicans go down this road before, and now they are after it again. 

    To make matters worse, 24-year-olds at ‘DOGE’ now have access to Americans’ most sensitive information at the Social Security Administration – after the Supreme Court overturned two lower court decisions. 

    No one wants their privacy exposed. 

    And there is no reason for ‘DOGE’ to have access to the medical records, income histories, and Social Security numbers of millions of Americans. 

    As the Social Security Commissioner, I would hope that you’d fight to protect Americans’ data privacy, but your agency called the Supreme Court’s decision a “win for the American taxpayer.” 

    That is why it is now up to Congress to protect Americans’ privacy and pass the legislation I have introduced with over 120 of my Democratic colleagues, including Ranking Member Neal and every Democrat on the Ways and Means Committee. 

    Today, you will face many difficult questions because all of us have heard from concerned constituents. 

    Americans want their benefits not just protected but enhanced, and they don’t want their private information shared with unapproved, unvetted, and unqualified 24-year-olds. 

    It is my sincere hope that we will continue to have more hearings like this and that you will at least be honest with us and provide Americans with the answers they deserve. 

    Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I yield back.

  • What is the impact of the 25/26 budget on the Rocky Hill Library?

    What is the impact of the 25/26 budget on the Rocky Hill Library?

    Rocky Hill’s new budget was passed last month. On June 9, Library director Michael Murphy shared with the Board of Trustees for the Rocky Hill Library what impacts on library personnel and service we could expect to see from the austere budget. 

    Like many of the departments that deliver town services, the library faces serious cuts from Town Council members beyond  the budget proposed by the town manager. Accounting for increased costs due the growth of salaries and inflation, the library director proposed a budget of $1,104,406. The Town Council approved a library budget of $1,033,896, a relative reduction of $70,510

    What changes were made to the Library budget to meet this new target?

    Staff hours reduced

    A 35-hour-per-week library technician has moved out of the district and left a position vacant. The library will not fill this position. The decision will reduce spending by $65,510.

    This change reverses a hiring decision made by the library. The library posted the job description for the replacement earlier this year, interviewed candidates, and made the decision to move a qualified part-time staff member into the full-time position, starting, at the request of the town, after the end of fiscal year 2025. Since the position has been frozen, the chosen candidate will continue as part time staff.

    Book purchasing budget reduced

    The library’s book purchasing budget was reduced from a proposed $92,000 to $87,000. The decision will reduce spending by $5,000.

    Why does this matter?

    The FY 25/26 budget continues a trend in reducing the library’s workforce. The loss of a 35-hour position follows the freezing of a 40-hour-per-week assistant director role left vacant in  2024, when the current library director was promoted.. This 40-hour-per-week position remains frozen. With these two positions, as well as several more flexible part time roles not being rehired, the library is currently operating on nearly a hundred labor hours fewer per week than it was in 2023.

    What is the impact on the community?

    Embedded within the town’s budget for the library is the expectation that in the coming fiscal year, the library will increase the number of library visits, program participants, and library card users by 2.5% each. While those are not, at face value, unreasonable goals, it is important to consider that increases in library use generally stem from outreach from librarians to members of the community (at schools, senior centers, public events, etc.) Furthermore, library programs, even those conducted by volunteers, require the support of library staff who are not being rehired. 

    It is not sustainable to expect 2.5% growth in user services if the town does not provide a proportionate investment in library staff.

    Though the library continues to provide important and robust services to citizens of the town, Murphy reported to the trustees that the library has likely hit its limit in terms of what budget cuts the staff can absorb without reducing services. Popular programs at the library are already quickly over-subscribed, and the demand for more programming cannot be met without supporting staff. For example, library workers have already had to reduce the number of technology help sessions offered to the community.

    Finally, the $5,000 cut to library books represents a 5.4% decrease from last year’s budget. While this cut may not seem out of line with cuts levied against other departments, it is worthwhile to consider the ways in which cuts across departments can compound each other. The 2025-2026 town budget, for example, also cut the summer literacy programs from the education budget. While it might be hoped that the library could help fill the important gap for Rocky Hill students who need extra literacy support, the library’s ability to offer summer support to these students decreases when the town slashes not only its staff, but also its materials budget.

    What can I do?

    Joining the Friends of the Rocky Hill Library and attending their fundraising events remains one of the best ways to support their library. The Friends of the Rocky Hill Library generate funds through regular donations, used book sales, mini-golf events, and more. They are already responsible for thousands of dollars of funding towards library programming and materials every year. Though their efforts cannot replace sustained public investment, community contributions through the Friends are invaluable, helping to keep the library active and afloat.

    Ultimately, the town government needs to hear from its community that the library is a cherished asset. Emails or direct conversation with the folks in charge of the budget, especially during budget season, can have a huge impact. Contact the town manager, the mayor, and/or your Town Council members to urge them to support the library director’s budget next year. 

    It is not a viable long-term strategy to ask departments to do more with less every year, and our library is too valuable to the community to let it wither away.

    Opinion piece: This article reflects the position of the author and not necessarily that of the Democratic Town Committee.