Category: Local

  • We Need More Walkable Community Projects Like This One in Rocky Hill

    We Need More Walkable Community Projects Like This One in Rocky Hill

    Rocky Hill residents can look forward to new sidewalks in a much-needed part of town. Connecticut Department of Transportation (CTDOT) State Project No. 0118-0191 will install new sidewalks to both sides of Route 99 (Silas Deane Highway) from Town Line Road to Marshall Road including under the I-91 overpass in Rocky Hill, CT.  Project Manager Melanie Zimyeski has stated the project will begin in the Spring of 2027.

    A map showing placement for sidewalks and crosswalks.

    If centering this project on active transportation, there is a lot of good news here. The stretch of road in question has three bus stops that promise to be adjacent to truly safe and comfortable crosswalks.  

    Those crosswalks are desperately needed. Back when the Town had a cute gelati shop named “Rita’s” I would pop over for an icy treat, and one day decided that I wanted to go from Rita’s to Orchard Street, en route to Parsonage, and back to Old Main Street. I could manage it, but only after dangerous crossing of highway lanes and ramps. Even with gelato to motivate me, the experience was a demonstration that Big Highway has taken so much away from the lived experience. Manageable fixes like investing in safe infrastructure can restore access to these “no go” zones.

    Providing access to this stretch of road will enable pedestrians to visit more local sites on foot. Duck behind the cavernous Stop & Shop and Walmart structures, and you’ll find a car free fire lane that dumps you onto Orchard Street.  

    From there, take Orchard back to Parsonage and Rocky Hill High School, or, travel west on Water Street to Mill Woods Park, and beyond that, Wolcott Hill Road, and the extraordinary D&D Market. Now I’ve gotten off track, and I’m nowhere near the Silas Deane, but that is part of the point: connectivity between roadways, between residential, and between retail. 

    The Silas Deane Exit 24 project is paid for with federal and state money, and residents are rightly excited for it. In my experience, however, once there is a question of spending local resources on pedestrian infrastructure, the conversation swiftly changes. Inevitably people will argue against investing in the infrastructure, relying on what I call the “not alotta people” theory, which claims that the absence of pedestrians and cyclists on our roads is evidence that those people don’t exist. 

    Be careful questioning “how many people use” something when your observation is traveling by car at 35-40 mph.  To see a road and accurately observe its users, I would recommend standing at the location for 15-20 minutes, and you will see multiple pedestrians and cyclists, and other modes, traveling through this area. If you stop for gas at “Mylz” across from Marshall Rd (and Taco Bell, and the Howard Johnson’s big chair!) keep an eye on the roadway under the 91 bridge. There is definitely a need for non-vehicular road users at this location.  You will see activity there in what’s known as a “desire path,” where the grass is worn down to dirt, by shoes, and bike tires, over the years. When safer, that usage will increase exponentially, and the State’s management of this space will be worth every penny.  

    “Desire lines” or desire paths are formed by walkers essentially voting with their feet. (source)

    But let’s also consider that there is a very, very good reason why not alotta people use it. 

    “It” is dangerous, and if you have the luxury of options, you will avoid “it”.  Any moral decision is based upon how many people would prefer to use “it” not how many people are currently (and reluctantly) using it. “Not alotta people” want to travel along  that dark and dangerous walkway. But add safety elements, infrastructure, (and a tasty taco truck?), and suddenly people will want to go there! This is known as retrofitting a road to suit the changes in society.  CTDOT State Project No. 0118-0191 is doing just that.

    The proposed project is great, but can be greater as a launch point for even more safety, beautification, and a stronger sense of place. As suggested by local advocates including members of Bike Walk Wethersfield, the below recommendations for the State Project are worth mention:

    • 10′ maximum travel lanes & 6′ sidewalks (from 11′ & 5′) on Route 99 between ramps
    • Slow down the Silas Deane and prioritize pedestrian safety over “level of service”
    • Add clear white light under the 91 overpass
    • Add  gateway murals 
    • Add a sign: “Welcome to Historic Rocky Hill: Everyone is Welcome Here”
    • Add pollinator gardens & street trees
    • Reimagine the Silas Deane Highway (which suggests high speed motorists) as the more inclusive Silas Deane Boulevard

    Thank you to the Connecticut Department of Transportation for taking on this project. Our local leadership should follow this example and provide a clear path to develop our sidewalk networks. Rocky Hill’s roads should be for all their users, including pedestrians and cyclists.  If you are excited for the upcoming changes in Silas Deane, consider joining the Walk Bike Rocky Hill community and supporting other changes to benefit our walk/bike infrastructure. 

    Opinion piece: This article reflects the position of the author and not necessarily that of the Democratic Town Committee.

  • RH community garden plans: carry in water, for now

    RH community garden plans: carry in water, for now

    On June 24, 2025, Rocky Hill’s Land Acquisition and Farmland Preservation committee met to discuss the community gardens, which are planned to launch in the spring of 2026. Committee members discussed the plan to provide water at the gardens, and the layout for garden plots. 

    Water for the gardens

    Director of Public Works Steve Sopalek provided an update on the effort to bring water to the community garden site. The town explored two scenarios: providing water from the drilled well that is already on site, and providing water through connecting to the public water system. 

    Well option

    The well was tested and was deemed “clean” and usable for watering plants. To use the well, the barn would be connected to electricity and a pump installed in the well, for an estimated cost of $15,000. To get an additional cistern and annual testing for the well would be an additional $35,000 – $40,000. Steve Sopalek remarked that the town lacks data on capacity of the well: how many people could use it?

    MDC option

    The town could alternatively connect the barn to public water through MDC. An assessment would be $350,000 and an estimated additional $15,000 would be spent on installation. Sopalek said that the assessment fee could possibly be waived.

    After reviewing the options, town manager Ray Carpentino said, “It sounds like people will have to bring their own water for a while.” While no final decision was made, Steve Sopalek said, “it’s probably a couple years out.”

    Evolving plans for garden plots

    In the last session, the committee agreed to move the community garden plots to the west side of the property. The committee will ask a town engineer revise the original plans for two possible layouts: one where the plots are 10ft x 20ft, and another where they are 15ft x 15ft. 

    The committee also continued to explore what design should be used for raised beds. Committee member Lisa Gilbert is exploring a potential donation of raised beds by a local construction company. The town would need to provide soil for these beds. At least some of the material could come from the town’s leaf mulch, has has been tested as “clean” and useable.

    The committee is considering creating twelve 3ft x 8ft beds. These beds would rest on the ground and be several feet deep to facilitate root growth and easier access.

    The committee will next meet on July 22.