, ,

Rocky Hill’s Tight Budget is the Result of Years of Poor GOP Decision-making

A wallet opens up and has nothing inside

Once again the annual budget season is upon us. In the coming weeks the Town Council will conduct a series of public hearings and workshops to set the mil rate that establishes the taxes for the upcoming fiscal year. 

The spectre of potential cuts in State and Federal funding hovers over the Council’s efforts to develop a budget this year. The chaos of the Trump administration results in increasing cuts of Federal funding to Connecticut. In turn, state legislators struggle to determine funds to towns amidst shifting federal priorities. Here in Rocky Hill, we must make a budget that takes all this uncertainty into account.

The Rocky Hill Town Council is responsible for creating a budget that maintains and perhaps enhances existing services while minimizing tax increases. The task this year is especially difficult due to GOP-led Council budget decisions, which have resulted in increased taxes and stagnant services.

The preamble to the Town Manager’s proposed budget correctly states that a considerable increase in taxes for the 2024-2025 tax period is due to homeowners revaluations. This is, however, only one part of the puzzle. Taxes rose not just because home values increased, but because the town took on significant financial burdens and failed to grow our economic sector.

For example, Rocky Hill was fortunate enough to receive approximately 5.9 million dollars under President Biden’s American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding during the COVID-19 pandemic era. These ARPA funds were supposed to allow the Council to maintain services and add enhancements as needed.  Unfortunately, rather than using the ARPA funding primarily for needed construction or maintenance projects, some ARPA funding was imprudently used for hiring  full-time positions at town hall. The full time Emergency Manager position turned into a fiasco and waste of funds. Others hired with ARPA funds which have been exhausted must now be funded by taxpayer tax money.

These funds could have been used to avoid a  tax burden. Many years ago the Town Council became aware that Stevens School required a new HVAC system. The HVAC project for Stevens School of approximately 1.6 million dollars could have been partially funded by the Town ARPA funds and partially funded by a State grant.  The GOP majority on the Council opted to not accept the grant, but to fund the Stevens HVAC project with local taxpayer dollars over a 3 year period. That project has now been extended even further due to other more urgent projects with the likelihood of increased costs going forward and little chance of obtaining further grants. This will ultimately cost the taxpayers even more money. 

Other factors have impacted the tax burden on Rocky Hill’s taxpayers. Reports from the Town Assessor have shown that our business Grand List – a listing of all assessed and taxable properties in town –  has remained mostly flat. This means that the bulk of any tax increases faced by the town falls on the backs of residential taxpayers.  Hopefully the recently hired Economic Development Manager can make a positive impact, after prior budgets had “frozen” that position, leaving no town staff exclusively working to grow Rocky Hill’s Grand List. 

As Democrats have consistently argued, the GOP majority exacerbates the tax burden for residents by overly favoring developers. Take the Republican decision to offer a  generous 10+ year abatement for the Kelson Row project.  Kelson Row is currently paying approximately $82,000 in taxes as opposed to the pre-revaluation estimated taxes of more than $1 million annually. As multi-family property values have skyrocketed since the pandemic, Kelson Row saw no increase, nor will see any increase, when it could  be contributing significantly more than $1 million per year to our tax base at full valuation. 

This abatement is not set to expire until 2034. Again, the taxes not paid because of this abatement must be paid by residential tax payers, many of whom are on a fixed income or are struggling families trying to make ends meet.

This year it is very important for the citizen taxpayers of Rocky Hill to make their voices heard. We the members of the Council represent you. Attend budget hearings and workshops and comment. Send in written letters or emails to be read into the public record, sign petitions, write letters to the editor. What are your priorities overall and what are your priorities should Federal or State funding be reduced? 

 A budget hearing will be held on April 22nd with workshops on April 24th, April 29th and May 1st. Also May 6th and 8th only if necessary. The Council final vote on the budget is on May 19th.  

Make your voices heard!

Join our mailing list to get more stories in your inbox.

Recent posts

Share your story

Do you have a story about Rocky Hill to share? Contact us to publish it here.

4 responses to “Rocky Hill’s Tight Budget is the Result of Years of Poor GOP Decision-making”

  1. A. Palazzolo Avatar
    A. Palazzolo

    I would like to see a count of the amount of people served in the offices that increased in hires. I know certain things increase regularly but we need to bargain with the services such as insurances. I also am very interested in seeing some open area in our town.Rocky Hill needs to maintain
    a welcoming atmosphere not wall to wall buildings. Vessel is building in Cheshire and its colors are beige and white. It looks nice . Our building is black and dark-did we have that choice or was collected by the on line survey

    1. Derek Caelin Avatar
      Derek Caelin

      The town is currently updating its Plan of Conservation and Development: https://rockyhilldems.org/the-draft-of-rocky-hills-new-plan-of-conservation-and-development-is-now-live/, In that doc the planners lay out a vision for how the town overall develops (which includes decisions like zoning, and housing density).

      The town does have regulations which impact things like color, and commissioners and the public can weigh in on the design (this often happens at planning and zoning meetings).

  2. A. Palazzolo Avatar
    A. Palazzolo

    I was trying to ask Did we have a choice of color for the Vessel building? Also I am amazed at what was collected by the on line survey.

    1. Allan L Smith Avatar
      Allan L Smith

      My memory is that the town had input on the color of the Vessel property at the time of the application. When the same company originally proposed 30 units on Main st, it was going to be white/beige. They introduced this black / dark color to make it look more consistent with the office buildings on and around Enterprise Dr. It did kind of look like it was designed by Darth Vader though.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *